In my continuing search for metaphors and references that have lost their meaning –or more importantly, behaviors and terms rooted in a bygone era, P.S. is now on my hit list. I realized this as I was typing an email, typed my closing (“thanks, Neil) and added the following:
P.S. Call my cell if there’s a last-minute change
Right after I wrote “P.S.” (and struggled w/ the issue around punctuation of periods) I realized that I should really just cut and paste that line into the body of the note. Literally (or figuratively) –the whole point of “post script” was “after the writing” or after the script, since it was far easier to provide the quick addendum v. going back and re-writing the entire letter (by hand or typewriter).
In the “Post Script” era of word processing and cut/paste it really just comes off as sloppy writing or an afterthought. Or does it serve some sort of rhetorical purpose (writorical?) My daughter Charlotte (the true test of relevancy in the digital era) said she still uses “P.S” but more for tone –a way of calling attention to something or providing it as a true “afterthought.” Perhaps we should now start writing (typing? texting?) “A.T.” instead since that’s a more true reflection of what it is.
And that brings us to the question—is the postscript relevant in a post –script era?
Neil
P.S. feel free to call me on my cell if you prefer to discuss in person. I mean over the phone…or Cell.